- AI
- Air Pollution
- Arbitration
- Asia
- Automobile
- Bangladesh
- Banking
- Biodiversity
- Biological Inventions
- bLAWgathon
- Brand Valuation
- Business
- Celebrity Rights
- Company Act
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Consumer Protection Authority
- Copyright
- Copyright Infringement
- Copyright Litigation
- Corporate Law
- Counterfeiting
- Covid
- Design
- Digital Media
- Digital Right Management
- Dispute
- Educational Conferences/ Seminar
- Environment Law Practice
- ESIC Act
- EX-Parte
- Farmer Right
- Fashion Law
- FDI
- FERs
- Foreign filing license
- Foreign Law
- Gaming Industry
- GDPR
- Geographical Indication (GI)
- GIg Economy
- Hi Tech Patent Commercialisation
- Hi Tech Patent Litigation
- IBC
- India
- Indonesia
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Protection
- IP Commercialization
- IP Licensing
- IP Litigation
- IP Practice in India
- IPAB
- IPAB Decisions
- IT Act
- IVF technique
- Judiciary
- Khadi Industries
- labour Law
- Legal Case
- Legal Issues
- Lex Causae
- Licensing
- Live-in relationships
- Lok Sabha Bill
- Marriage Act
- Maternity Benefit Act
- Media & Entertainment Law
- Mediation Act
- Member of Parliament
- Mergers & Acquisition
- Myanmar
- NCLT
- NEPAL
- News & Updates
- Non-Disclosure Agreement
- Online Gaming
- Patent Act
- Patent Commercialisation
- Patent Fess
- Patent Filing
- patent infringement
- Patent Licensing
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Marketing
- Patent Opposition
- Patent Rule Amendment
- Patents
- Personality rights
- pharma
- Pharma- biotech- Patent Commercialisation
- Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations
- Pollution
- Posh Act
- Protection of SMEs
- RERA
- Sarfaesi Act
- Section 3(D)
- Signapore
- Social Media
- Sports Law
- Stamp Duty
- Stock Exchange
- Surrogacy in India
- TAX
- Technology
- Telecom Law
- Telecommunications
- Thailand
- Trademark
- Trademark Infringement
- Trademark Litigation
- Trademark Registration in Foreign
- Traditional Knowledge
- UAE
- Uncategorized
- USPTO
- Vietnam
- WIPO
- Women Empower
NCLT on Gitanjali Gems Liquidation: Analysing its Role and Authority Under IBC, 2016
Introduction The jewellery retailer Gitanjali Gems, which is owned by the wanted man Mehul Choksi, notified the exchanges on Monday that the NCLT Mumbai bench has mandated the company’s liquidation. The decree came into effect on February 7, 2024. A company or corporation may be liquidated by winding up its operations by selling off its … Continue reading NCLT on Gitanjali Gems Liquidation: Analysing its Role and Authority Under IBC, 2016
Read more »Conundrum of Limitation Period under IBC and Inapplicability of the Doctrine of Election
Recently the Supreme Court in the case of Tottempudi Salalith v State Bank of India & Ors.[1] (Tottempudi Salaith) held that the doctrine of election cannot be applied to prevent a financial creditor to approach the National company law tribunal (NCLT) for initiating a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor under Section … Continue reading Conundrum of Limitation Period under IBC and Inapplicability of the Doctrine of Election
Read more »Can passing of a Resolution Plan obliterate proceedings under section 138 of NI Act?
Introduction The Supreme Court of India vide its order dated 28th March, 2022 in Narinder Garg v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (“Narinder Garg”) decided upon the effect of the passing of a resolution plan, under section 30(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”), on the validity of proceedings under section 138 of the … Continue reading Can passing of a Resolution Plan obliterate proceedings under section 138 of NI Act?
Read more »Settling an incertitude conundrum: Whether the Adjudicating Authority is mandated to admit the application under Section 7 of the IBC without considering the extraneous matters involved?
Introduction To start a Corporate Insolvency Resolution (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor, the Financial Debtor must file an application before the Adjudicating Authority under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The highlight of this section is that the Adjudicating Authority, after admitting the application, shall give an order within seven days of … Continue reading Settling an incertitude conundrum: Whether the Adjudicating Authority is mandated to admit the application under Section 7 of the IBC without considering the extraneous matters involved?
Read more »Discretionary power of the Adjudicating Authority to reject CIRP applications under Section 7(5)(a) of the IBC
The National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has traditionally held that it is mandatory for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process(CIRP) to be initiated once the existence of a debt has been established under Section 7(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. There was no separate interpretation of Section 7(5) … Continue reading Discretionary power of the Adjudicating Authority to reject CIRP applications under Section 7(5)(a) of the IBC
Read more »Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 | Arbitral Proceedings- The Contrast
In the year 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was introduced to consolidate all the laws associated with the Insolvency resolution of the corporate personalities with aim to realise the maximum value of assets for such corporate persons in a time-bound manner and to promote entrepreneurship, available of credit and to protect the interest of the … Continue reading Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 | Arbitral Proceedings- The Contrast
Read more »Scope Of NCLT & NCLAT’s Powers Under Section 7 Of IBC, 2016
INTRODUCTION The NCLT was established under Section 408 of the Companies Act, 2013 18 of 2013 w.e.f 01st June 2016 to exercise and discharge all duties and functions conferred on it by or under this Act or any other law in force at the time. The IBC’s institutional foundation called for the creation of a … Continue reading Scope Of NCLT & NCLAT’s Powers Under Section 7 Of IBC, 2016
Read more »Winding Up/ Liquidation process under the Companies Act, 2013 vis-à-vis Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code, 2016
A firm (for convenience sake called “CD”) regularly supplies certain raw materials to a partnership firm (for convenience sake called “QR”) carrying out its business of manufacturing geysers. After 6 months of regular supply of goods, QR fails to clear the outstanding dues of “CD” amounting to principal amount of Rs.1,25,00/- with interest accrued thereon. … Continue reading Winding Up/ Liquidation process under the Companies Act, 2013 vis-à-vis Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code, 2016
Read more »Mobilox Innovations Private limited vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited
The much debated question with respect to the interpretation of what amounts to “existence of a dispute” has been finally answered by the Supreme Court in the (Mobilox vs. Kirusa) judgment. The interpretation of “existence of dispute” was seen in the context of initiation of CIRP of corporate debtors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, … Continue reading Mobilox Innovations Private limited vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited
Read more »