Blogs

Anti Cancer drug: Making it Patient-driven, not Disease-driven

11th April, 2011 - 10:16 am Categories: Patent Commercialisation Pharma- biotech- Patent Commercialisation

Introduction: French compatriots Ipsen and bioMérieux, have been few most potential companies, since 2007 in the development of companion assay to assess patient benefit from a compound useful for treating several severe forms of cancers.Partnership between two companies has focused on the two main broad areas of pharma research: Personalized medicine and Theronostics. Personalized medicine … Continue reading Anti Cancer drug: Making it Patient-driven, not Disease-driven

Read more »

Microsoft Corp V/s TiVo, Inc

13th February, 2011 - 9:36 am Categories: Patent Litigation

The present case relates to an infringement petition filed by Microsoft Corp against TiVo, Inc. in California Northern District Court, for infringing its two patents, Patent No. US 6,008,803, (‘803) and Patent No. 6,055,314, (‘314). The case was filed on January 19, 2010. The case is still waiting for its decision and its next hearing … Continue reading Microsoft Corp V/s TiVo, Inc

Read more »

Soy Meal a “Dead Material”- No Functional DNA

27th January, 2011 - 1:01 pm Categories: Patent Litigation Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations

A Patent Infringement suit was filed by Monsanto Technology LLC against Cefetra, Vopak Agencies and Alfred C. Toepfer International GmbH, for exporting soy meal from Argentina to European Community. The judgement was carried out by the court of justice of European Communities “Grand Chamber”. Preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Rechtbank’s’Gravenhage (Netherlands). Introduction: … Continue reading Soy Meal a “Dead Material”- No Functional DNA

Read more »

“Clear and Convincing Evidence”

10th January, 2011 - 5:58 am Categories: Patent Litigation

Case “Microsoft Vs i4i” interests me as I saw the recent Supreme Court decision to hear this case again. Long story in short, i4i filed a patent in 1994 and gets granted on 07/98 (US 5,787,449). ‘449 relates to a system and method for the separate manipulation of the architecture and content of a document, … Continue reading “Clear and Convincing Evidence”

Read more »

Claim Construction – Interpretation to Determine Obviousness

10th January, 2011 - 5:56 am Categories: Patent Litigation

The present case relates to reexamination (Reexamination No. 90/008,482) of US Patent No. 5, 236, 503, referred to as ‘503 hereinafter. The concerned Applicant GLATT AIR TECHNIQUES, INC. (referred to as Glatt hereinafter) appealed against the order of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, which was decided on 5’th Jan 2011. As an introduction, … Continue reading Claim Construction – Interpretation to Determine Obviousness

Read more »

Sun Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly: Doctrine of Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

16th December, 2010 - 8:38 am Categories: Patent Litigation Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations

A remarkable latest change in the Patentability has risen from the decision of the Federal Circuit in the case Sun Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly, over the later’s patent that claimed the use of gemcitabine (GEMZAR), a drug to treat cancer. Sun Pharma moved to lower court to invalidate this patent on the grounds of obviousness-type … Continue reading Sun Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly: Doctrine of Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

Read more »

International Patent Protection in Electronics & It (Sip-Eit) Scheme by Dit

16th December, 2010 - 7:32 am Categories: Hi Tech Patent Commercialisation Patent Commercialisation

It is enriching to hear and read so much of focus going these days into Innovation at Grass Root and Startup level. With initiatives being taken at all levels by Stakeholders including FICCI, MSME, DIT, and NASSCOM, the next wave of the so called Start-up innovation can really be envisioned. As has correctly been stated … Continue reading International Patent Protection in Electronics & It (Sip-Eit) Scheme by Dit

Read more »

Trademark tiff between Masculine drink makers and its challengers!

23rd September, 2010 - 8:49 am Categories: Trademark Litigation

Just days after I bought my first bottle of the ‘must have’ “Knock-out” pepper spray, I came across a trademark dispute between the makers of this product and manufacturers of the beer brand “Knock-Out”. What came next were a series of interesting case laws, and evidences, and finally the verdict of Delhi High Court Justice … Continue reading Trademark tiff between Masculine drink makers and its challengers!

Read more »

Greif & Technocraft

13th September, 2010 - 10:50 am Categories: Patent Litigation

The case is all about a mech. patent granted in Europe in 2008. The Proprietor (Applicant) Grief International Holding B.V is holding the Patent EP 1467922 (‘922). The Patent relates to an improved container closure plug having a unique gasket retaining feature. Interestingly, Technocraft Industries, a company based out of India filed an Opposition in … Continue reading Greif & Technocraft

Read more »

The Bilski Battle Ends…still the war of Patenting Business Method is on…

27th July, 2010 - 5:01 am Categories: Patent Litigation

Introduction:- Do you need one? I am sure by this time you would have read or heard about the Bilski case somewhere. Well it’s not too late to know about it. Petitioner filed a patent application that claims a Business method @ USPTO. The claim included a subject matter that explains how commodities buyers and … Continue reading The Bilski Battle Ends…still the war of Patenting Business Method is on…

Read more »

Categories

Archives