Navigating Patentability: Metaverse Inventions Under the Indian Patent Act

Industrial Relevance

As defined under Section 2(1)(ac), Indian Patents Act, industrial application means any invention or discovery which may be used or adapted for manufacture in any industry including agriculture.

Patent applications related to the Metaverse should explain how the invention works in practice, demonstrating a practical application beyond just theoretical principles of industry in action.

That is, patentability requirements cut across all technical domains such as software, virtual reality, and even the metaverse. Thus, the evaluation would include a detailed technical description of the invention and how the latter impacts the art’s progress.

Exceptions

Indian Patent Act Section 3

Types of inventions that are not regarded as patentable are listed in Section 3 of the Indian Patent Act. These include discoveries which infringe on the law, which are silly, or manifestly obvious, and atomic energy, and conventional wisdom.

Specific exclusions are available in the subheadings of Section 3. For instance, a mathematical or business method or a computer program per se or algorithms are excluded from patent protection under Section 3(k).

Software and Business Methods Excluded

It also contains many features that under its terms of operation, throw out, business procedures and software in their per se sense so goes with the broader debate in the international circle.

Hence, exclusion of software per se may indeed bar patentability in pure computer programs which have no actual technological application or innovative step.

The Metaverse is the combination of technologies such as virtual reality, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence. Innovation in the Metaverse may be commercial practices, software, or an algorithm.

An innovation related to the Metaverse, but not under Section, would be purely software or a commercial approach without even any specific technological contribution.

Business practices and software are not covered.

Indian Patent Act is characterized by exclusion of software and business processes. Internationalized debate on patentability supports the same in both these disciplines.

Exclusion of software itself could make purely computer programs which have no distinctive technical application or creative novelty unpatentable.

Impact on Metaverse-Related Inventions:

Metaverse refers to a hybrid of virtual reality, augmented reality, artificial intelligence among others. Some of the metaverse inventions include algorithms, software, and even commercial practises.

If the invention that relates to the Metaverse is just software or a commercial strategy and does not contribute any novel technological advance, then it can be excluded from Section.

Disclosure Obligations

The Indian patent system is established and governed by the Patents Act, 1970 and Patent Rules, 2003. Patent filing in India, basically requires a process wherein there should be a drafting of an application with the accompaniment of a full specification which contains information relating to an invention. The disclosure becomes relevant, so that the detailed information about the invention gets given in such a form and manner that another skilled man in the concerned technological art, can understand and make the same.

Full Specification

A patent application must be accompanied with a full specification, that is, detailed description of the invention. If that description is clear and concise, it should be able to explain and replicate innovation by a person skilled in art or any person who possesses knowledge about the area that is relevant to the area that the innovation pertains to. Written descriptions, drawings and, if necessary, demonstration of how to make and use the invention are typically incorporated in the specification.

A person skilled in the art should be able to carry out the invention using the specification alone without undue experimentation. It shall reveal the best mode that the inventor could think of to put the invention into practice. Best Mode requirement has that when the inventor makes the application, the inventor shall disclose the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out the invention. The patent is deemed void in case of failure to make such disclosure of the best mode.

Patent Filing
[Image Sources: Shutterstock]

Enablement: This may depend on the detail based upon the complexity of the invention. In theory, a broad patent should be an incentive for the inventor so he doesn’t give so much information that others can use his innovation without his permission. Final section-the claims: There must be at least one or more claims which clearly identify and claim the subject matter believed to be the invention. Claims, which state what is covered by the patent, must be supported by the description in the specification. A summary description of the invention may be required by some offices as a cover sheet and/or as an abstract within an application.

If drawings are required to illustrate the invention, they will be annexed to the patent application. The description should contain a notation and references to the drawings.

An oath or declaration is usually required for patent applications, swearing to the validity of the inventor from being the true originator of the invention that he is claiming.

To successfully prosecute a patent application and later enforce the awarded patent, certain disclosure criteria must be complied with. It confers exclusive rights to the creator while ensuring that the public is aware of the innovation.

Patent Examination Procedure

  1. Filing a Patent Application: The first step for patent is the filing of the patent application. This patent application must be filed at one of the four patent offices located in Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, or Kolkata. The inventor can do this or may get the task done through his or her duly authorized agent.
  2. Formality Check: To ensure the application is meeting the formality requirements that exist within the formal conditions of the Patents Act and Rules, the Indian Patent Office conducts a formality check. The repute is given an opportunity to rectify this lapse in case of such lapses.
  3. Publication: After the priority or filing date that is eighteen months old, the application is published. When an application is published, it shall be open for public inspection.
  4. Request for Inspection: The patent application is not examined as a matter of routine. A request for inspection shall be made by the applicant or any interested third party within 48 months from the date of priority or filing.
  5. Search: Indian Patent Office searches if the application complies with the grounds of industrial applicability, inventive step, and novelty that will enable it to become eligible for receiving a patent. In case of software inventions, the patent office would verify whether the invention aided towards technology rather than merely being a commercial or mathematical method.
  6. FER: FER issued by the Patent office publishes after scrutiny which incorporates examination of the application including all objections raised against the said application, hence first chances given by them is by letting reply to FER that also by providing a timeframe within.
  7. Amendments and Hearings: If the EPO’s objection lies on some grounds, then the applicant is permitted to file amendments to the application. If an applicant is required, then applicant can request hearing and argue to be patentable.
  8. Award or Rejection: The patent is awarded if all criteria for patentability are satisfied and any objection raised to the applicant is overcome. Alternatively, the Patent Office can reject the application.
  9. Opposition After Grant: Permit third parties for a limited period of opportunity to oppose the grant after a patent has issued.

Author: : Mukund Ranjan, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

References:

  1. IndiaFilings (2023) Software patent registration, IndiaFilings. Available at: https://www.indiafilings.com/learn/software-patent-registration/ (Accessed: 11 November 2023).
  2. Sharma, A. (2015) Section 3(K) of the India Patents Act, 1970: A never ending challenge for it giants – patent – india, Section 3(k) Of The India Patents Act, 1970: A Never Ending Challenge For IT Giants – Patent – India. Available at: https://www.mondaq.com/india/patent/394478/section-3k-of-the-india-patents-act-1970-a-never-ending-challenge-for-it-giants#:~:text=Section%203(k)%20of%20the%20patent%20act%20describes%20that%20there,computer%20program%20me%20or%20algorithms.
  3. Ravindra Chingale (July 2015), Software Patent in India: A Comparative Judicial and Empirical Overview, National Law University Delhi, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights
  4. Vol 20, pp 210-222

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010