- AI
- Air Pollution
- Arbitration
- Asia
- Automobile
- Bangladesh
- Banking
- Biodiversity
- Biological Inventions
- bLAWgathon
- Brand Valuation
- Business
- Celebrity Rights
- Company Act
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Consumer Protection Authority
- Copyright
- Copyright Infringement
- Copyright Litigation
- Corporate Law
- Counterfeiting
- Covid
- Design
- Digital Media
- Digital Right Management
- Dispute
- Educational Conferences/ Seminar
- Environment Law Practice
- ESIC Act
- EX-Parte
- Farmer Right
- Fashion Law
- FDI
- FERs
- Foreign filing license
- Foreign Law
- Gaming Industry
- GDPR
- Geographical Indication (GI)
- GIg Economy
- Hi Tech Patent Commercialisation
- Hi Tech Patent Litigation
- IBC
- India
- Indonesia
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Protection
- IP Commercialization
- IP Licensing
- IP Litigation
- IP Practice in India
- IPAB
- IPAB Decisions
- IT Act
- IVF technique
- Judiciary
- Khadi Industries
- labour Law
- Legal Case
- Legal Issues
- Lex Causae
- Licensing
- Live-in relationships
- Lok Sabha Bill
- Marriage Act
- Maternity Benefit Act
- Media & Entertainment Law
- Mediation Act
- Member of Parliament
- Mergers & Acquisition
- Myanmar
- NCLT
- NEPAL
- News & Updates
- Non-Disclosure Agreement
- Online Gaming
- Patent Act
- Patent Commercialisation
- Patent Fess
- Patent Filing
- patent infringement
- Patent Licensing
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Marketing
- Patent Opposition
- Patent Rule Amendment
- Patents
- Personality rights
- pharma
- Pharma- biotech- Patent Commercialisation
- Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations
- Pollution
- Posh Act
- Protection of SMEs
- RERA
- Section 3(D)
- Signapore
- Social Media
- Sports Law
- Stamp Duty
- Stock Exchange
- Surrogacy in India
- TAX
- Technology
- Telecom Law
- Telecommunications
- Thailand
- Trademark
- Trademark Infringement
- Trademark Litigation
- Trademark Registration in Foreign
- Traditional Knowledge
- UAE
- Uncategorized
- USPTO
- Vietnam
- WIPO
- Women Empower
The topic of maintenance frequently leads to disputes among married couples. It involves tying one’s financial security to emotional hardship. In India, laws like the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and Hindu Marriage Act offer provisions to safeguard the rights of financially weaker spouses during and post divorce proceedings. This article explores the intricacies surrounding maintenance laws, their scope, and court interpretations based on landmark cases.
Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code: The Bulwark of Maintenance
Section 125 of the CrPC is a significant law. It ensures family members receive financial aid. The law requires people to support their spouse, kids, and parents. It applies to all citizens, regardless of religion. Section 125 crosses faith and personal law boundaries.
The law focuses on the welfare of dependent persons. It protects spouses and kids who rely on others for money. The law gives quick support while divorce cases are ongoing. So the legal fight does not impact the claimant’s living. Section 125 emphasizes the needs of the financially dependent party.
Landmark Case Laws under Section 125 CrPC:
- The Supreme Court decision in Rajesh Sharma vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017) clarified the right to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. It is a statutory right that exists outside personal law. The court emphasized the married relationship alone, irrespective of faith, necessitates maintenance.
- In Shamima Farooqui v. Shahid Khan (2015), the Supreme Court ruled a husband’s financial inability does not absolve him of legal maintenance obligations. However, the court has discretion to determine the amount based on his financial capacity.
- Bhuwan Mohan Singh v. Meena (2014): As the Supreme Court observed, merely because the wife did not seek maintenance from her husband during the marriage, and in fact is financially capable of providing for herself, this fact is not a bar to the wife’s right to seek maintenance should the marriage continue. The court noticed that the wife’s right to maintenance is connected with only one condition set by Section 125 CrPC.
The Hindu Marriage Act: Maintenance Provisions in Divorce Proceedings
The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 is the statute that sets down a comprehensive scaffolding on support in cases of divorce in Hindu marriages. Thus borrowing the section no. 24 of the Act, a court has a right to grant the maintenance and permanent alimony for either of the spouses as and when the need calls during the time of a divorce order.
In addition to that, Section 25 focuses on other factors that the court has to look into when determining this allowance of maintenance, among those factors are the financial resources of both parties, conduct and other relevant circumstances of each party.
Landmark Case Laws under the Hindu Marriage Act:
- Vinny Parikh v. Bakul Parikh (2015): It was the Supreme Court which held that the maintenance provided to the wife under the Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act is not dependent on her financial independence or the amount of property in her name. It was emphasized by the court that the wife, in this instance, is entitled to maintenance, devoid of the necessity for her to be under-earning or in the process of raising children.
2. Manish Jain v. Akanksha Jain (2017): The Supreme Court used this judgment that prevents the Section 25 of the Indian Hindu Marriage Act maintenance rights confined to the marriage life period. The Court determined that after the marriage has broken down, the wife should underprivileged entitled for maintenance only subject to the court’s discretion with respect to the particular situation.
3. Siddhant Gupta v. Dimple Gupta (2021): The Appellate Court considered the disposition of temporary maintenance payments during the process of divorce. By making this determination, the Court holds that a husband must fulfill his obligation to provide maintenance since the wedding day until the prevailing divorce action is resolved.
Factors Influencing Maintenance Determination
In the light of deciding on alimony claims the tribunal looks into several factors to reach a fair and balanced alimony ratio.These factors include:
1. Financial Status and Earning Capacity: The court calculates both parties’ financial assets, income, and income potential to even the scale between who can pay much and who can pay less.
2. Standard of Living: The parties’ standard of living during the marriage is a significant factor, since the maintenance payment is meant to support the weaker financially spouse so that his/her living standard does not quickly fall behind the lifestyle he adapted during the marriage.
3. Age and Health: The ages and health status, major factors in determining whether the party would be able to finance themselves without the other party.
4. Educational credentials and Employability: The court looks at the possibilities for the spouses to stand by themselves through education and employment credentials including for the financially dependent spouse who may be unable to achieve such credentials.
5. Conduct and Fault: In certain situations, a court may tackle the spouses conduct and fault during the marriage as a factor for that support amount.
Conclusion
The question of the enactment and effect of the above is mainly brought across in the maintenance of divorce proceeding that makes one the country’s desire to uphold the economic welfare of the citizens and empower them. While S. 125 and Hindu Marriage Act have both provided a strong case on the subject of legally disadvantaged spouse to freely choose their own religion and personal law, they are also entitled to rights that should in the domain of fairness be granted as per property distribution.
Judiciary now adays play the key role in the process of development and has become the major tool in implementation of the maintenance laws through many judgments where judiciary has interpreted various provisions of the maintenance laws very strictly and extensively and made the guiding principles of the laws un-ignorable such as – only justice, fairness and interest of the marginalized are to be considered. Similarly, the confrontation of societal values and human persons evokes cause and effect issues and therefore, justice is sought out by the invested parties, in the best interest of the society.
The proper maintenance in the divorce processes holds a value to the community not only on the financial matter; it is a worth-while service which carries the torch of the principles of dignity, equality and compassion. To mention just one, the biggest charitableness benefit for poor people is the strong financial support and helps these people not to end up in poverty and hunger-death.
Author: PARTH GAWDE, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.