What Constitutes a Groundless Threat under Section 60 of the Copyrights Act, 1957?

Groundless threat, as the name suggests, is a threat to an alleged infringer by the copyright claimant, without actually instituting any suit or action against the infringer. The Copyright Act, of 1957 (herein referred to as “the Act”), provides for civil as well as criminal remedies to an aggrieved party against acts of infringement. By Section 55 of the Act, the legislation has sought to provide civil remedies to a person whose copyright has been infringed upon. Similarly, criminal remedies are stated under Section 63 of the Act.

copyright act1

However, some remedies are also provided to parties who suffer due to baseless allegations of infringement or groundless threats made by the said copyright owner. The laws against groundless threats are designed to protect people from being harassed or intimidated by unfounded legal claims. Section 60 of the Act, gives a chance to such victims of groundless threats, to obtain an injunction against such threats, and to provide

It is a question to ponder upon, as to what constitutes a ‘Groundless Threat’ within the
meaning of the Copyrights Act, 1957. Section 60 of the Act states that “Where any person claiming to be the owner of copyright in any work, by circulars, advertisements or otherwise, threatens any other person with any legal proceedings or liability in respect of an alleged infringement of the copyright, any person aggrieved thereby may, notwithstanding anything
contained in section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, institute a declaratory suit that the alleged infringement to which the threats related was not, in fact, an infringement of any legal rights of the person making such threats and may

in any such suit— (a) obtain an injunction against the continuance of such threats; and (b) recover such damages, if any, as he has sustained by reason of such threats: Provided that this section shall not apply if the person making such threats, with due diligence, commences and prosecutes an action for infringement of the
copyright claimed by him.”

Looking at the language of the proviso of this section, it can be interpreted that if any
person claiming the copyright, “commences and prosecutes an action for infringement”, no declaratory suit under Section 60 can be instituted. Since the Copyrights Act, 1957 provides for criminal as well as civil remedies against an act of infringement, an action against infringement, within the meaning of the Copyrights Act, 1957, can be either criminal or civil.

In the judgment of Dhiraj Dharamdas Dewani v. Sonal Info Systems Pvt. Ltd. 2012, the Ld. Judge of the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench), stated that “Lodgment of FIR, seizure carried out by the police against the appellant and finally filing of the charge sheet is nothing but the initiation of legal proceedings and criminal liability against the appellant for the alleged infringement of the copyright of the respondents.” Therefore, it was declared that any action, as simple as filing an FIR against the alleged infringer, constitutes ‘and action against infringement’ and hence the possibility of protection under Section 60 nullifies.

Author: Vaishnavi Choudhary Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010