Navigating The Choppy Waters Of India’s Solvency And Bankruptcy Code

Introduction

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (referred to as IBC or the Code) is India’s bankruptcy law, designed to consolidate the existing framework by creating a comprehensive statute for handling insolvency and bankruptcy cases. The introduction of IBC aimed to completely overhaul India’s financial distress resolution system, as the prevalence of Non-Performing Assets and debt defaults was on the rise, and earlier loan recovery mechanisms like Lok Adalats, Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), and Debt Recovery Tribunals were proving ineffective.

Working of the Code

Both businesses and individuals fall under the purview of this Code, which establishes a time-bound process for resolving insolvency. In case of debtor default, creditors take possession of the debtor’s assets and have 180 days to settle the bankruptcy. During this period, the Code protects debtors from resolution claims by creditors to ensure a smooth resolution process. The Code creates a unified platform for creditors and debtors of all categories to resolve bankruptcy while consolidating existing legal rules.

[Image Sources : Shutterstock]

IBC

According to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), the primary aim of the IBC is resolution, which involves salvaging a firm as an ongoing entity through reorganization, changes in ownership, acquisitions, and other methods. The secondary goal is to maximize the market value of assets owned by the corporate debtor, and the third objective is to promote entrepreneurship, credit availability, and balance interests. The Code considers the sequence of these functions as sacrosanct.

What Exactly Are The “Choppy Waters”?

Looking through this lens, the IBBI data shows 3,400 cases filed under the IBC in the past six years, out of which more than 50% of the cases resulted in liquidation whereas merely 14% of the cases went through the primary aim of the Code which is a proper resolution. There was a small ray of light during 2016 and 2017, but by 2018, a similar fate was met by most of the cases and only 15% to 25% cases were approved for resolution plans.

In contrast to the frequently sluggish phases of prior mechanisms, the IBC was marketed as a time-bound mechanism. The capacity to act quickly is essential here to prevent further erosion of the business’s financial stability or the worth of its assets. The IBC initially set a 180-day timetable for completing the settlement procedure, with a 90-day extension allowed.

Later, the IBC was revised to extend the completion deadline to 330 days, or about a year. Although in 2018, while the deadline was 180+90 days, the majority of cases—from those involving corporations owing less than 50 crores to those owing more than 1000 crores —were resolved in less than 300 days.

On the other hand, cases involving businesses that owed more than 1,000 crores were resolved in 772 days in FY22. According to specialists, the average number of days required to settle these situations has climbed substantially over the course of the past five years.

Additionally, it is expected that creditors will be able to recover the full amount of their unpaid claims when a settlement occurs. The sale of the company’s assets is fragmented, however, when liquidation occurs. This implies that the value that may be realized by resolution should be greater than through liquidation, which would be the final option.

Yet, the difference between both of these valuations has narrowed over time, and in the fourth quarter of 2022, the sum realized was less than what the assets ought to have garnered had they been liquidated.

A haircut is the amount of debt waived by the lender as a percentage of the pending claims. In 2021, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance stated that throughout the five-year term of the IBC, creditors had to take an 80% haircut in over seventy percent of the instances.

Essar Group has a debt of 42,000 crores at the end of 2015.The corporation has no choice except to restructure its whole debt. Essar Steel was forced to pay Creditors a staggering 54,547 crore. After several years of challenges, ArcelorMittal’s resolution plan, which included a 42000-crore payback, was approved by the committee, and the transaction was completed quickly. ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India was rebranded.

With the exception of a few high-profile sales, mostly of steelmakers like Essar Steel India Ltd., the recovery rate for creditors has only been 24%, according to Macquarie. India may be able to isolate wealth more quickly than in the past, but it cannot yet extract a lot out of perished companies.

According to a probe by The Hindu Data Team, 33 of the 85 firms that owe more than 1,000 crores had to face haircuts of more than 90% throughout the settlement process. In the instance of Videocon Group, creditors were forced to accept a 95.3% haircut. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has highlighted that creditors cannot be assumed to give up 95% of their claims, despite the fact it is likely that some enterprises were previously in a non-operational status prior to initiating the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) procedure.

The Standing Committee has pointed out additional challenges within the IBC. These relate to the behavior of the Insolvency Professionals (IPs) and the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The Committee noticed that the CoC had significant authority in adopting resolution plans and selecting IPs, and it called for more transparency and the development of a professional code of conduct for the CoC.

Regarding insolvency professionals, the Standing Committee highlighted that 61% of the 203 professionals examined since 2016 faced disciplinary action led by IPAs and the IBBI. This indicates the importance of having a single regulatory body to ensure optimal standards and transparency in the functioning of IPs.

Conclusion

In an effort to resolve the backlogs, the Parliamentary Standing Committee proposed that the NCLT allow the insolvency application and transfer management of the business no later than 30 days from filing. It proposed recruiting beforehand considering the predicted number of cases, noting an over fifty per cent shortfall in the Tribunal as opposed to the authorized capacity.

The commission further suggested that the NCLT establish separate benches for IBC matters. The Committee advised extending the pre-packs option to all corporates following evaluation in order to minimize case burdens. The pre-Packed Insolvency Resolution Process (PIRP), unlike Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), allows the debtor to carry on running the business while the resolution procedure is underway.

The IBBI has additionally requested a new standard for evaluating haircuts. It was recommended that haircuts should instead be viewed as the difference between the value realized and what the firm takes with it when it enters an IBC rather than as the gap between the creditor’s claims and the actual amount realized. According to this contention, a company’s worth may have already drastically decreased by the time it is subject to the Code’s procedure, hence the value realized should be based on the company’s current assets rather than its prior assets.

Author: Kaustubh Kumar is a fourth-year law student at the National University of Study and Research in Law, Ranchi, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

References

  1. A charter of responsibilities of IPs and CoC IBC laws – insolvency & bankruptcy (IBC), Companies Act & Sarfaesi, https://ibclaw.in/a-charter-of-responsibilities-of-ips-and-coc/?print-posts=print
  2. Case note: Judgement of the Supreme Court in the Essar Steel Case – Insolvency/bankruptcy – India Case Note: Judgement Of The Supreme Court In The Essar Steel Case – Insolvency/Bankruptcy – India, https://www.mondaq.com/india/insolvencybankruptcy/1058270/case-note-judgement-of-the-supreme-court-in-the-essar-steel-case
  3. Explained: The insolvency and bankruptcy code (IBC)- where does it stand today? The Hindu, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/explained-what-is-the-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-ibc-and-where-does-it-stand-after-more-than-five-years-of-being-in-place/article65969421.ece
  4. For a 90% haircut, try India’s bankruptcy salon mint, https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/for-a-90-haircut-try-india-s-bankruptcy-salon-11625443411590.html
  5. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code – Insolvency/bankruptcy – India Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code – Insolvency/Bankruptcy – India, https://www.mondaq.com/india/insolvencybankruptcy/627706/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code
  6. Manupatra Articles, https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/INSOLVENCY-AND-BANKRUPTCY-CODE-AMENDMENT-ACT-2021-CRITICAL-ANALYSIS

The insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: All you need to know PRS Legislative Research, https://prsindia.org/theprsblog/the-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-all-you-need-to-know

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010