- AI
- Air Pollution
- Arbitration
- Asia
- Automobile
- Bangladesh
- Banking
- Biodiversity
- Biological Inventions
- bLAWgathon
- Brand Valuation
- Business
- Celebrity Rights
- Company Act
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Consumer Protection Authority
- Copyright
- Copyright Infringement
- Copyright Litigation
- Corporate Law
- Counterfeiting
- Covid
- Design
- Digital Media
- Digital Right Management
- Dispute
- Educational Conferences/ Seminar
- Environment Law Practice
- ESIC Act
- EX-Parte
- Farmer Right
- Fashion Law
- FDI
- FERs
- Foreign filing license
- Foreign Law
- Gaming Industry
- GDPR
- Geographical Indication (GI)
- GIg Economy
- Hi Tech Patent Commercialisation
- Hi Tech Patent Litigation
- IBC
- India
- Indonesia
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Protection
- IP Commercialization
- IP Licensing
- IP Litigation
- IP Practice in India
- IPAB
- IPAB Decisions
- IT Act
- IVF technique
- Judiciary
- Khadi Industries
- labour Law
- Legal Case
- Legal Issues
- Lex Causae
- Licensing
- Live-in relationships
- Lok Sabha Bill
- Marriage Act
- Maternity Benefit Act
- Media & Entertainment Law
- Mediation Act
- Member of Parliament
- Mergers & Acquisition
- Myanmar
- NCLT
- NEPAL
- News & Updates
- Non-Disclosure Agreement
- Online Gaming
- Patent Act
- Patent Commercialisation
- Patent Fess
- Patent Filing
- patent infringement
- Patent Licensing
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Marketing
- Patent Opposition
- Patent Rule Amendment
- Patents
- Personality rights
- pharma
- Pharma- biotech- Patent Commercialisation
- Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations
- Pollution
- Posh Act
- Protection of SMEs
- RERA
- Section 3(D)
- Signapore
- Social Media
- Sports Law
- Stamp Duty
- Stock Exchange
- Surrogacy in India
- TAX
- Technology
- Telecom Law
- Telecommunications
- Thailand
- Trademark
- Trademark Infringement
- Trademark Litigation
- Trademark Registration in Foreign
- Traditional Knowledge
- UAE
- Uncategorized
- USPTO
- Vietnam
- WIPO
- Women Empower
In a matter relating to the grant of an ad-interim injunction against a threat to publish allegedly defamatory statement over the Internet, while having possession of a remedy under lawful recourse, the City Civil Court of Bengaluru temporarily restrained a Defendant from tarnishing the goodwill and reputation of a well-known cosmetic and beauty care brand, ‘Urbaine Consumer Pvt. Ltd.’, on social media via a smear campaign. The Court granted the interim injunction order as an immediate cure and remedy.
The Plaintiff, Urbaine Consumer Pvt. Ltd., a wellness and cosmetic company operating under the brand name “The Wellness Shop,” instituted a suit against the Defendant, a consumer who had purchased a product from the Plaintiff. Despite its recent establishment, the Plaintiff had reportedly built a thriving business with a pan-India presence.
The Defendant, dissatisfied with their experience, allegedly threatened to tarnish the Plaintiff’s reputation by initiating a smear campaign on social media. In response, the Plaintiff sought an ad-interim injunction to restrain the Defendant from engaging in conduct that could harm its goodwill and reputation.
The City Civil Court, upon consideration of the matter, issued a temporary injunction order against the Defendant. The order restrained the Defendant from creating, publishing, uploading, or disseminating any false, defamatory, or misleading statements or posts that could result in harm to the Plaintiff’s reputation. The injunction was granted to preserve the Plaintiff’s goodwill and mitigate potential damage to its reputation until the next date of hearing.
The case serves as a notable example of judicial intervention through interim relief to address and prevent reputational harm arising from defamatory campaigns on social media platforms.
The Plaintiff Company was represented by Khurana & Khurana, Advocates & IP Attorneys through its litigation team Tarun Khurana, Abhijeet Deshmukh, Amarjeet Kumar, Arjun Santhosh and Ms. Sumana Satyamurthy.