- AI
- Air Pollution
- Arbitration
- Asia
- Automobile
- Bangladesh
- Banking
- Biodiversity
- Biological Inventions
- bLAWgathon
- Brand Valuation
- Business
- Celebrity Rights
- Company Act
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Consumer Protection Authority
- Copyright
- Copyright Infringement
- Copyright Litigation
- Corporate Law
- Counterfeiting
- Covid
- Design
- Digital Media
- Digital Right Management
- Dispute
- Educational Conferences/ Seminar
- Environment Law Practice
- ESIC Act
- EX-Parte
- Farmer Right
- Fashion Law
- FDI
- FERs
- Foreign filing license
- Foreign Law
- Gaming Industry
- GDPR
- Geographical Indication (GI)
- GIg Economy
- Hi Tech Patent Commercialisation
- Hi Tech Patent Litigation
- IBC
- India
- Indonesia
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Protection
- IP Commercialization
- IP Licensing
- IP Litigation
- IP Practice in India
- IPAB
- IPAB Decisions
- IT Act
- IVF technique
- Judiciary
- Khadi Industries
- labour Law
- Legal Case
- Legal Issues
- Lex Causae
- Licensing
- Live-in relationships
- Lok Sabha Bill
- Marriage Act
- Maternity Benefit Act
- Media & Entertainment Law
- Mediation Act
- Member of Parliament
- Mergers & Acquisition
- Myanmar
- NCLT
- NEPAL
- News & Updates
- Non-Disclosure Agreement
- Online Gaming
- Patent Act
- Patent Commercialisation
- Patent Fess
- Patent Filing
- patent infringement
- Patent Licensing
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Marketing
- Patent Opposition
- Patent Rule Amendment
- Patents
- Personality rights
- pharma
- Pharma- biotech- Patent Commercialisation
- Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations
- Pollution
- Posh Act
- Protection of SMEs
- RERA
- Section 3(D)
- Signapore
- Social Media
- Sports Law
- Stamp Duty
- Stock Exchange
- Surrogacy in India
- TAX
- Technology
- Telecom Law
- Telecommunications
- Thailand
- Trademark
- Trademark Infringement
- Trademark Litigation
- Trademark Registration in Foreign
- Traditional Knowledge
- UAE
- Uncategorized
- USPTO
- Vietnam
- WIPO
- Women Empower
Khurana & Khurana Advocates and IP Attorneys recently represented a workforce management company in an ongoing suit and successfully obtained an ad interim ex parte injunction restraining the Defendant from issuing groundless threats to the company and its employees and creating, publishing, uploading, sharing, disseminating any false, defamatory and misleading statement or post against the company.
The suit was instituted against a former employee of the company, who was making spurious and false claims about the company and threatening to make defamatory statements about them on social media and public platforms, which would have resulted in tarnishing and bringing disrepute to the goodwill and reputation of the company. After the company’s attempts to settle the dispute amicably were unsuccessful, they approached the Hon’ble City Civil and Sessions Court at Bengaluru seeking a permanent injunction against the Defendant. The Hon’ble City Civil and Sessions Court, on admitting the suit and hearing the counsel for the Plaintiffs, was pleased to grant the injunction as prayed for till the next date of hearing.
The company is represented by Mr. Tarun Khurana, Mr. Abhijeet Deshmukh, Mr. Arjun Santhosh and Ms. Anvita G. Joshi of Khurana & Khurana Advocates and IP Attorneys before the Hon’ble City Civil and Sessions Court at Bengaluru.
Author: Anvita G. Joshi, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.