Legal Framework for Over-The-Top (OTT) Platforms and Apps in India: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

The popularity of Over-the-Top (OTT) content in India is at its peak currently. These sources provide a huge amount of content which caters to the entertainment industry. But there is not much talk about the rules and regulations which are being followed by the content creators on such platform. This article is specifically throwing light on the legal aspects of OTT platforms and apps in India which includes the legal questions and the actions to be taken and the penalties around it.

Applicability of the Cinematograph Act:

The Cinematograph Act,1952 was enacted to primarily make regulations related to certification, exhibition and distribution of films which could be termed as traditional cinema, and hence this brings the question of its applicability in OTT platforms and apps. Under Section 4 of Cinematograph, Act films need to obtain a certificate from the Central Board of film Certification and then only they could showcase their films but this does not apply to OTT platforms as OTT platform do no come under the definition of “Cinema Hall”.

Considering this, there have been cases when regulations have been invoked, for instance in the case of Justice for Rights Foundation V. Union of India where the Delhi High Court held that OTT platforms should be on the lines of the Cinematograph Act and they should not violate the provision and the Central Government has the power to regulate digital media platforms in order to maintain decency, public order and morality. Also, according to the act there are certain penalties for non-compliance, Section 7B of the Act states that if the film on an OTT platform or app is presented without the necessary certificate, the penalty may extend to fine and/or imprisonment for a period of 3 years.

Applicability of Information Technology Rules:

While OTT platforms and apps might not directly fall under the Cinematograph Act, they are still governed by the Information Technology Rules, 2021. Under the Information Technology Act of 2000, these regulations were put in place by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to control intermediaries, such as OTT platforms and applications, functioning in the digital sphere.

[Image Sources : Shutterstock]

OTT Platform

According to Rule 3(1)(b) of the Information Technology Rules- it is important to keep in mind that the users should be aware of the nature of the content and then make informed choices w.r.t the content they put out. OTT platforms and apps need to classify the content they offer into different age categories Universal, Adult and Parental Guidance etc. and then make it available to the viewer

Rule 3(2) of the Rules states that the OTT platforms and apps need to setup a grievance redressal mechanism to look after the complaints and make sure the content shown on these platforms are not in violation of the law in any manner. The platforms must register their grievance redressal mechanism with the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB). They are also required to appoint a Chief Grievance Officer, who will be responsible for addressing user complaints and collaborating with law enforcement agencies.

Rule 3(4) of the Rules states that the OTT platforms and apps need to provide parental locks for content that is classified in the Adult Category. This is to ensure that children do not access such content under the restricted category. Rule 4(1) OTT platforms and apps requires the take down of content with 36 hours if they receive a legal notice and if they do not comply with order penalties could be imposed.

Legal Actions and Examples:

In recent years there have been many legal actions taken as regulatory intervention in India. In the case of Amazon Prime Video India Originals V. Union of India, the validity of Information Technology Rules was challenged stating that they impose restrictions which are arbitrary and unreasonable in nature and there is certain hope that the case when settled would bring about some clarity on this subject.

Penalties for Non-compliance

There are certain penalties which may be imposed on a person if non-compliance is done such as Section 7B which states that if a film is shown on an OTT platform or app without obtaining the necessary certificate from CBFC, a fine would be imposed as may the case may be or a term of imprisonment that can extent up to 3 years.

If situations such as noncompliance of grievance redressal mechanism, parental lock it could lead to penalties which may range to INR 5 Lakh to INR 10 crores depending on case-to-case basis

Conclusion

In conclusion, the framework on which OTT platform and apps in India runs are not very easy to understand but surely involves the intersection of Cinematograph Act and Information Technology Rules. While the Act may not directly be involved but the inclusion of Information Technology Rule imposes specific conditions which makes it some way inclusive to adhere the Cinematograph Act. Non – compliance with the regulatory requirements may attract penalties, including fines and imprisonment. It is crucial for OTT platforms and apps to be aware of the legal aspects and ensure compliance with the applicable laws to avoid legal challenges and penalties.

Author: Anisha Mishra, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at  Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

Citations / References

  1. Bhatia, A., & Rastogi, A. (2019). OTT Platforms and their Legal Compliance: An Analysis of the Indian Regulatory Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3424734
  2. Kohli, S., & Saurav, S. (2020). OTT Platforms in India: Legal Challenges and the Way Forward. The Indian Journal of Law and Technology, 2(2), 99-116. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3767639
  3. Rawat, A., & Singh, R. (2020). Over-The-Top (OTT) Platforms in India: Legal and Regulatory Landscape. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 13(26), 2655-2662. doi:10.17485/ijst/2020/v13i26/149232
  4. Sharma, S., & Chandra, P. (2020). Content Regulation and OTT Platforms in India: Legal Challenges and Policy Implications. Global Media Journal, 18(35), 1-19. doi:10.22059/gmj.2020.304239.1007520
  5. Singh, V., & Joshi, A. (2019). Legal Implications of Over-The-Top (OTT) Platforms in India. Legal Services India. Retrieved from http://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-3581-legal-implications-of-over-the-top-ott-platforms-in-india.html

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010