Analysis of new Inserted Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) provision (Section194R)

Introduction

To ease the burden of the assesses (general public who are taxpayers) to pay the tax on due date at the end of the financial year the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) deducts the tax at source on the due income before being credited to the general public. In this case, deduction is done by the payer who is called as “deductor” and the general public is called as “deductee” making tax returns easily accessible at the time of tax return filing. However, it wasn’t much effective in such transaction for getting benefit or perquisite arising from business or profession such as doctors receiving free samples of medicines, social media influencer receiving any free products to promote the same or a manufacturer giving gifts to seller or distributor on accomplishing any target. To plug the tax evasion in such types of transactions section 194R has been inserted under the Income Tax Act, 1961 to track the benefit or perquisite in the form of cash or kind falling within the scope of section 28(iv) of the Act. The rate of deduction is 10% and threshold of Rs 20,000 has to be for deductee.

TDS

[Image Sources : Shutterstock]

Valuation and Threshold

According to CBDT the basis for the valuation of the benefit or perquisite will be fair market value except in the following cases-

  • In case where the benefit or perquisite provider has purchased the same before giving it to the recipient, value for the benefit of perquisite will be purchasing price.
  • In case where the benefit or perquisite provider is the manufacturer, value for the same will be the price at which it is given to customers.

GST will not be calculated for valuation of benefit or perquisite for TDS u/s 194R.

Now, if the value or aggregate value after doing valuation of the provided benefit or perquisite exceeds Rs. 20,000 during a financial year, deduction of tax will be on entire value and not merely the excess of 20,000.

Liability of the Deductor on how to make tax deduction

The person in charge for giving a benefit or perquisite to a recipient must ensure that tax has been deducted and paid for the benefit and perquisite, and that the tax necessary to be deducted has been paid by the beneficiary:

  • “deductor” by paying from his pocket or by grossing up.
  • “deductee” gives cash to the deductor to pay the tax required to be deducted.
  • Deduction in the amount of TDS to the account of the payee.
  • Tax paid by payee himself in the form of advance tax and gives challan to the payer.

In the last case, CBDT clearly states the number of challans and copy of the payment of advance tax will be required to be reported in the TDS return.

Applicability of the Provision

  • It is only applicable to residents getting benefits or perquisite arising from business or the profession by such resident. For example-
  • If a medical shop provides sample of medicines to the doctor of a particular hospital, the tax will be deducted for that benefit or perquisite.
  • When an employer pays for a trip for a worker when they reach a particular goal.
  • When someone offers incentives in exchange for goods or services like a car, TV, laptop, expensive mobile phone, etc.
  • In the scope of Section, 194R brings all the situations where benefit or perquisite is swholly in cash or partly in cash or wholly in kind or partly in kind.
  • The benefit and perquisite shall be taxable even if their nature is the capital asset in general sense like car, land, etc. but for the recipient, it is benefit or perquisite, hence Section 194R will apply to the same. For example- where a social media influencer has been given a car by the company “X” for which the influencer promotes their Cars, the value of car will be beneficial and taxable.

Non- applicability of the Provision

Situations exempted under this provision:

  • If the value or aggregate value of the benefit or perquisite is less than 20,000 during the financial year.
  • If a provider is a specified individual or HUF whose total sales or turnover is less than Rs. 1 crore in case of business and 50 lakhs for profession.
  • If the provider and beneficiary are in a relationship of worker and employer.
  • If the incentive and acquisition are unrelated to the same provider resident’s work or profession.
  • If benefit or perquisite is given to a customer who doesn’t exercise any business and profession.
  • If a benefit or perk is permitted, it may take the form of a sale discount, a cash discount, or a refund to customers by seller.

Core issues involved

This provision covers the benefit and perquisite covered u/s 28(iv) of the act, which says, the benefit received has to be in kind and not monetary, held by the Hon’ble Supreme court in case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. However, this provision intends to cover monitory benefits.

The provision states that valuation of the benefit or perquisite will be based on fair market value. However, the term fair market value has nowhere defined.

This provision contains various types of difficult transactions which will impose serious challenges on deductors.

Expenditure of the family of the person travelling for business purposes is not covered under perquisite held in the case of David Dhawan [2005]. However, section 194r covers this as perquisite.

This provision states nexus in business must be there which means only applicable to resident in business or profession by such resident. B2C benefits or perquisite are not covered under this provision.

In case of non-residence benefit or perquisite recipient, no TDS is applicable which will make TDS return bulkier.

Conclusion

From the above article, Section194R is an extensive provision that talks about varied nature of transactions which are difficult to define. It will be quite compelling to watch how the Government will make various rules for this provision. Seeing the wide scope of this provision one thing is certain it will cover more transactions under benefit and perquisite in coming years. On one hand, this provision has increased the burden of the provider of benefit or perquisite. But on the other hand, it makes sure that every benefit or perquisite is tracked and plugs tax evasion in the country.

Author: Kajal Kumari, a final year law student from Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, New Law College, Pune, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

References

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-provisions-section-194r-194s-applicable-01-07-2022.html

https://www.financialexpress.com/money/income-tax/tds-rule-for-social-media-influencers-under-section-194r-2022-explained/2577751/

https://www.taxmann.com/post/blog/faqs-section-194r-of-the-income-tax-act-tds-on-benefit-or-perquisite/?amp

https://indianexpress.com/article/business/capital-assets-given-benefits-under-section-194r-scope-8001967/

 

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010