Plaintiff and Defendant Case : Bengaluru Court Passes Interim Order Restraining The Access Of The Software “PKMP” And The Use Of The Trade Name “APL”

Plaintiff and Defendant Case: The Commercial Court of Bangalore in an original suit granted ex parte interim injunction against a party for breach of non-disclosure agreement, misappropriation of intellectual property, and passing off.

The Plaintiff, a pharma software solution company, hired Defendant to develop a software, “Pharmacokinetic Modeling Program” (PKMP), which is used for supporting pharmaceutical research and development. The software is registered with the copyright office of the USA under the plaintiff’s name.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant, in 2017, decided to incorporate an entity in India under the name APL. The company, in pursuant of the incorporation, created a website to showcase the registered software, PKMP.

The court ordered the said decision in view of the facts that the defendant, on the dissolution of the business partnership between the two parties, instead of handing over the plaintiff’s intellectual property, confidential information and other assets which he possessed during the course of his association in the plaintiff’s company as per the NDA between them, blocked access to “GoDaddy” website account on which the Plaintiff’s Domain Name and website was licensed.

In addition to the above, the defendant also created a similar website and provided the same in the “Home Page” of the Plaintiff’s original website, hence passing off as the plaintiff.

The court hence held: “an Exparte Temporary Injunction is ordered restraining the defendant by himself or through his representatives, agents, family members and all other persons claiming under or through him or acting in concert with him or otherwise howsoever by or with him directly or indirectly from marketing, selling or accessing the plaintiff copyright software Pharmacokinetic Modeling Program(PKMP) or representing to be part of or Associated with plaintiff company or any of its affiliates and using any of its trade name, trade mark domain name, E-mails access codes, software codes, databases which are owned by the plaintiff company or any other comprising of the term APL in any manner whatsoever till the appearance of the defendant.”

Appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff are, Mr. Tarun Khurana, Mr. Abhijeet Deshmukh, Mr. Arjun Santhosh, Advocates of Khurana and Khurana, Advocates & IP Attorneys.

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010