Tax Laws For Non Residents Professional Athletes

INTRODUCTION

Top level athletes competing in various sports earn millions of dollars in wages. Just like a normal wage earner, they are entitled to pay their dues to the government. Earning extraordinary wages also leads to extraordinary tax payments. Cristiano Ronaldo –a top level athlete decided to join Juventus F.C., one of Italy’s leading football clubs. Ronaldo signed a four-year contract with Juventus, earning a net annual salary of roughly € 30 million ($ 35 million), which means, on the basis of current Italian marginal tax rates, a gross salary of € 55 million ($ 64 million). In this respect, Italy’s recent tax law changes have influenced many athlete’s relocation to Italy.

ITALY

The Italian Budget Law of 2017 introduced a significant tax incentive regime for high net worth individuals who wish to relocate to Italy. With the introduction of a new article in the Italian Income Tax Act, article 24-bis, certain “new-resident” taxpayers who relocate to Italy may opt for a yearly € 100,000 flat tax on their foreign-source income.

Italy’s new tax system is particularly attractive to professional athletes. Professional footballers who signed a sports performance contract with an Italian football club are regarded as employees of the football club, and therefore, the income derived from his/her services is regarded as subordinate employment income. If the service is performed in Italy, the income is taxed in Italy. Therefore, it is regarded as income derived from Italy and is taxed at the ordinary Italian tax rate, which is excluded from the € 100,000 flat tax. If an athlete’s image rights are not addressed as part of the employment contract, the income that is attributable to the exploitation of the image rights may be categorized as “other income” under domestic Italian tax rules. If such income is related to assets located abroad or activities carried out outside of Italy, such income will be considered foreign income. For example, a football player’s payment received from an American sportswear company for a sponsored event in China that has nothing to do with the football player’s performance on the football team can be considered income from a non-Italian source. Alternatively, if the athlete’s image rights have been allocated to a non-Italian image rights company, the dividends paid by the company (that is, the image rights company that manages the athlete’s image rights) can be regarded as non-Italian source income by the foreign entity, absent a finding of abuse. Some athletes who appear to be affected by tax cuts (such as 50% of non-taxable income) may qualify for 70% non-tax recognition. At other times, it is necessary to understand the true nature of the income that professional athletes receive or other specific elements of the case to confirm the applicability of the tax benefit in question.

ENGLAND

From a tax perspective, the UK also offers a preferential tax system for residents who are not domiciled in the UK: the resident homeless system (“British RND”). Under the UK RND system, taxpayers requiring a tax’ remittance base’ are only required to pay UK tax when remitting income and capital gains outside the UK. Foreign income and earnings not remitted to the UK are not taxable in the UK. If a taxpayer has at least 15 UK tax residents in the last 20 UK tax years, they will be deemed to have settled in the UK for all tax purposes as of the 16th tax year in which they lived in the UK. United Kingdom: means a tax on foreign income and gains based on production (not only when this foreign income and gains are remitted to the United Kingdom), and a 40% inheritance tax in the United Kingdom on global assets that exceed the £ 325,000 threshold (subject to Certain spousal exemptions or charitable disposition).

Perhaps the most significant difference between the British and Italian systems is the complexity of the tax remittance base. For taxpayers with offshore investment accounts or structures, the rules regarding remittances can be burdensome to administer. Unlike the UK, Italy does not require taxpayers to perform special accounting treatments or report foreign source income or income remitted to Italy.

SPAIN

Like England, the Spanish League also has a reputation for being a highly entertaining soccer league. From a tax perspective, Spain also offers preferential tax incentives for new taxpayers who transfer their tax residence to Spain. In fact, according to the so-called Beckham Law, new employees who have not been tax residents in Spain in the last 10 years can enjoy preferential taxation during the first six years if they move to Spain under a contract of I work with a Spanish employer. The treatment has lived in Spain for many years. More specifically, the maximum marginal tax rate for dividends, interest and capital gains is 23% (if it is greater than 50,000 euros), while the tax rate on earned income is 24%, up to a maximum of 600,000 euros, and the excess tax rate is 45%.

INDIA

Section 115BBA deals with income earned by non-resident athletes from participating in any game (except winning a game subject to 115BB tax), advertising or contribution items related to any game or sport in India. Income will be taxed at a rate of 20%.

As per section 194E of Income Tax Act, TDS on payment to non-resident sportsmen shall be deducted @ [20% + surcharge if applicable + health and education cess of 4%] at the time of credit or payment whichever is earlier. Non-resident athletes can avoid double taxation under a double taxation agreement. Non-resident athletes normally live outside India but earn income in India. In this case, income earned in India may be taxed in India and your country of residence. This means that they must pay taxes on the same income twice. To avoid this, the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) was introduced.

As per Article 18 of the said treaty, income derived by a resident of USA as an athlete, may be taxed in India, if the amount of the net income derived by such entertainer or athlete from such activities (after deduction of all expenses incurred by him in connection with his visit and performance) exceeds $ 1,500 or its equivalent in Indian rupees for the taxable year concerned. If the income exceeds $ 1,500, then the full amount will be taxable in country of performance.

Author: Tarsh Khanna – a student of BBA.LLB (Hons) of Symbiosis Law School (Pune), currently an intern at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys.  In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at sudhanshu@khuranaandkhurana.com.

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010