Petition Against Celebrities Endorsing Online Gambling Activities – A Futile Attempt

Introduction

In a bizarre case, a Chennai based advocate filed a petition for banning of online gambling activities, in the Madras High Court, while also seeking the arrest of Indian Cricket Captain, Virat Kohli, and Actress, Tamannah Bhatia, for promoting online gambling platforms and corrupting the mind of the youth. The petition is a result of a recent suicide of a 19-year youth who failed to repay his debts accumulated from online gambling and alleges that gambling companies use influential celebrities like Virat Kohli in abetting youngsters to gamble online. Very recently, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court expressed its anguish over the lack of regulations for online gambling platforms and stressed upon the immediate need to address and regulate online games in the country. The single-Judge Bench correlated this with a rise in criminal activity being committed by “unemployed youth” who may “go to any level to meet their loss”. The present petition, however, takes this train of thought a step further to pray for the blanket shutdown of these platforms; the arrest of all individuals running them; and, most peculiarly, that of celebrities endorsing the same.

Dissecting the Plea

While the regulation of gambling websites has been the subject matter of several State statutes (e.g. Sikkim Online Gaming Regulation Act, 2008, Nagaland Prohibition of Gambling and Promotion and Regulation of Online Games of Skill Act, 2016, etc.), and there have been numerous cases in various courts on online gambling activities, the liability of individuals advertising or endorsing these platforms has never been called into questioning. At best, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, comes closest to imparting accountability towards those individuals who endorse misleading advertisements. Furthermore, a perusal of the Madras High Court in the aforementioned matter itself would show that the legality of online gambling platforms is not something that has ever been decided upon by the apex court. When it comes to games involving stakes, the Supreme Court has been perspicuous: those games which depend upon the player exercising their skill would not be considered gambling. Even if there is an element of chance involved, as long as the outcome depends majorly on the skills of the player, the game would be that of “mere skill” and thus, excluded from the definition of gambling. The idea of trying individuals for abetment of suicide in youngsters after getting them hooked to online gambling is when the plea becomes even more precariously placed. Abetting suicide requires “intention and involvement of accused to aid or instigate commission of suicide.” There must also be a “course of conduct or action of intentionally aiding or facilitating another person to end life.” In light of these very well-settled principles of penal law relating to the abetment of suicide, it can be reasonably concluded that Virat Kohli et al. are not going to be tried for the offence anytime soon.

Conclusion

The regulation of online gambling activities is most definitely a vacuum which needs to be filled by the concerned authorities; the faster, the better. It is a case of concern that even after numerous cases on illegal online gaming and the call for regulation of online gambling by various courts throughout the nation; the legislature has shown little or no interest in providing clarity on the matter. A 2018 Deloitte report attributes the penetration of low-cost smart phones and a rise in internet connectivity in urban markets to the projection of India becoming the largest potential market for online gaming. Moreover, various international players have also been successfully exploiting the lacuna in our system and have introduced several online gambling websites in the Indian market, legally. However, the present petition does not seem to be the one which is aimed at achieving these ends and fails to ask the right questions. In fact, serious allegations such as these are more likely to dilute the seriousness of the issue at hand than help with lacunae in the law.

Author: Kaushitaki Sharma, a student of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University intern at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys.  In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at aishani@khuranaandkhurana.com.

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010