January, 2012 | Khurana and Khurana

Cookie “Companies” sued by University and Exclusive Licensee thereof

25th January, 2012 - 1:35 pm Categories: Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations

Infringement suit was filed on September 7th 2011 in Western District of Wisconsin by Brandeis University, USA (Brandeis) along with its exclusive licensee GFA brands (“Plantiffs”), against a dozen of cookie companies including Nestle USA, Inc., The Pillsbury Company, LLC, Keebler Co., Famous Amos Chocolate Chip Cookie Company, LLC, East Side Ovens, Inc., Murray Biscuit … Continue reading Cookie “Companies” sued by University and Exclusive Licensee thereof

Technology Transfer/Licensing Opportunity of Crop/Agri Technologies with Syngenta

15th January, 2012 - 4:14 pm Categories: Patent Commercialisation

0 Comments

IIPRD is among the leading Indian IP Consulting Firms focusing on Technology Transfer and Licensing for numerous Indian and Global Corporates and Research Institutes. IIPRD is highly active in the Technology Transfer and Licensing of Patent Backed Technologies/IP’s in the domains of Pharmaceutical, Life Sciences, Diagnostics, Biotechnology, Telecommunications, Software and Medical Devices among others. Syngenta is … Continue reading Technology Transfer/Licensing Opportunity of Crop/Agri Technologies with Syngenta

Gevo – Butamax back and forth Ongoing Infringment Lawsuits

14th January, 2012 - 7:24 am Categories: Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations

0 Comments

It looks like a never ending infringement lawsuits between Gevo Inc. and Butamax Advanced Biofuels LLC on IP rights of bio-isobutanol, a well known biofuel. On September 13, 2011, Gevo Inc. was granted two patents by USPTO that involved technologies enabling low-cost, high-yield production of bio-based isobutanol. Gevo’s patent 8,017,375 (‘375), “Yeast Organism Producing Isobutanol … Continue reading Gevo – Butamax back and forth Ongoing Infringment Lawsuits

Practice Pointer Series: Brief on Patenting Diagnostic Methods in India

14th January, 2012 - 7:19 am Categories: IP Practice in India

0 Comments

Patenting of medical methods is prohibited in India according to Section 3 (i) of the Indian Patent Act, which states that “any process for the medicinal, surgical, curative, prophylactic [diagnostic therapeutic] or other treatment of human beings or any process for a similar treatment of animals to render them free of disease or to increase … Continue reading Practice Pointer Series: Brief on Patenting Diagnostic Methods in India

Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. Vs. Perrigo Co.- Dispute Related to Pharmacokinetic Claim Terms

4th January, 2012 - 5:24 pm Categories: Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations

0 Comments

Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. Vs. Perrigo Co.- Dispute Related to Pharmacokinetic Claim Terms Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. (Adams)-“Plaintiff” holds patent 5,372,252 (‘252 patent), which covers an extended release formulation containing guaifenesin (an expectorant used to thin, loosen, and helps expel mucus that causes congestion). Adams markets Mucinex® which is the preferred embodiment of the ’252 … Continue reading Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. Vs. Perrigo Co.- Dispute Related to Pharmacokinetic Claim Terms

Month: January 2012

Cookie “Companies” sued by University and Exclusive Licensee thereof

Technology Transfer/Licensing Opportunity of Crop/Agri Technologies with Syngenta

Gevo – Butamax back and forth Ongoing Infringment Lawsuits

Practice Pointer Series: Brief on Patenting Diagnostic Methods in India

Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. Vs. Perrigo Co.- Dispute Related to Pharmacokinetic Claim Terms

Categories

Archives